Capture One Pro 11 Fujifilm version. A first look.

Β·

Estimated Time to Read:

4–5 minutes
Capture One Pro 11 Fujifilm first look portrait edited with Fujifilm X-Pro2 35mm

Today, with the beginning of the 2018 Photokina edition, we got some great news for Fujifilm fans and users, and as you should know, I am one of those.

First of all, the new medium-format camera, the Fujifilm GFX 50R; then the announcement of the future GFX 100 MP; and, more than ever, a new special version of Capture One dedicated to Fujifilm users.

This is a welcome addition, since Phase One already had something similar for Sony cameras. Now it’s our turn, Fujifilm users.

Some of you may say that we already had support for Fujifilm cameras on the regular version of Capture One Pro 11. That’s true, but there was no direct support for tethered shooting, and especially no support for the GFX camera series.

All these issues seem to be addressed in the new Fujifilm-specific Capture One Pro 11 edition.

So I’ve just downloaded the demo, which is fully functional for 30 days. I have to say the demo doesn’t have any export watermark limitations, so it seems 100% functional.

First impressions on Capture One Pro 11 Fujifilm

Looking at the photos just imported into Capture One Pro 11 Fujifilm, the conversion quality and colors are very good and natural when you have a correct white balance in your raw shots. So when you open these files in Capture One without any edits, they already have a nice color balance. However, I couldn’t find the advertised “film simulation support” anywhere. Maybe that will be a demo limitation, but I was expecting to find the beloved “Classic Chrome”, “Astia,” and other Fujifilm color profiles. * Read the update below.

The workflow in Capture One is a bit different from Lightroom’s: if you have experience with raw development in other software such as Lightroom and Photoshop, you will not have any difficulty mastering the sliders. The point is that Capture One, from the initial install, is a bit more “confusing” than Lightroom. But one advantage of Capture One over Lightroom is the ability to reorganize your workspace, move palettes, and create your own personal workflow.

My personal advantages of Lightroom over Capture One Pro

  • Direct Fujifilm color simulation that mimics almost perfectly the JPG shots in camera, as the “Classic Chrome”, “Astia”, “Velvia” and so on. * Read the update below.
  • I prefer Lightroom’s cleaner interface.
  • Can’t find the before/after editing button like in Lightroom. Yes, in Capture One you can do it by pressing ALT and the “back arrow,” but it isn’t the same as the one-button way to go.
  • I’ve found filtering in Capture One a bit harder to master.
  • I prefer the Copy/Paste photo editing in Lightroom to the one in Capture One; it’s easier to use.
  • Lightroom has the strong advantage of a cloud system that allows you to sync your photos with the mobile app on any Android or iOS device. It isn’t existing (at the moment) a Capture One mobile app.
  • Lightroom’s spot and correction tool is far faster and easier to use.
  • I’ve found the brushes a bit faster and more responsive in Lightroom than in Capture One.

I want to point out that these are just my personal opinions: I’ve been a Lightroom user and teacher since beta 1 was released in 2007, so it’s normal that it is difficult to jump directly to different software and workflow and be fast with the operations.

My personal advantages of Capture One Pro over Lightroom

  • I think the biggest advantage I can name at the moment of Capture One Pro over Lightroom in the workflow is the possibility to edit/tweak the photos even when you have more pictures on the screen. This way, you can balance them by looking at a group of similar shots in the session.
  • I love the Loupe function for seeing part of the photo.
  • The Skin Advanced Editor is an impressively useful feature.
  • I really appreciate the export simulator, which shows you the final exported file with the resolution and sharpening you’ve set with the export options.
  • Curve for Luminosity (change the luminosity of the image but not the saturation) and a separate curve for the RGB values.
  • You can personalize all the keyboard shortcuts for any setting. For example, you can set your preferred button combination to raise/lower exposure, saturation, and so on.
  • The highlight and shadow recovery is much more precise than in Lightroom.
  • You have full layer support. This way, you can plan your edits using different layers, as in Photoshop. There are some limitations, since you have to use specific layers for the kind of editing you want to do (like the layer for spot removal).
  • I love the grain simulation in Capture One. It seems more organic and convincing than the one in Lightroom.

Version of Lightroom used: Lightroom CC 7.5.
Version of Capture One used: Capture One Pro Fujifilm 11.3.
Camera used: Fujifilm X-Pro 2 with 35mm f/1.4.

Update 25/9/18

I’ve been informed that official film simulation support is coming with a future update. In my opinion, this decision sounds a bit strange, since this was the first reason I downloaded the demo version of Capture One 11 Fujifilm β€” to test the quality of the film simulation compared to the one in Lightroom.

Purchase or license the images

The images featured in the articles are available to purchase as prints or license. If something catches your eye, feel free to get in touch to discuss usage rights, print options, or licensing for your project.

Alessandro Michelazzi Avatar

ABOUT

Comments

20 responses

  1. Mikael Tjemsland

    Thanks for your round-up. I generally agree with your findings. However, for me, the main reason to stick with LR is library module. There is a lot of good applications for RAW development (C1, Irident etc.) , but I have not yet seen a DAM (digital asset manager) that is on par with Lightroom.

    1. Ciao Mikael! Yes, I do agree! The Library module in Lightroom is just cleaner and the filters selections work easily. I know there are the same options in Capture One but I have the feeling there’s always some more passages in clicks to do compared to Lightroom.
      But let’s spend some time on it to get used to the different workflow and let’s see if I can get more comfortable with Capture One too! πŸ™‚

    2. Tommy Williams

      If you’re willing to use two separate programs, the DAM capabilities of iMatch blow Lightroom away. I’ve been waiting for years for Lightroom to catch up.

      https://www.photools.com/

      1. Thanks! Although I think one of the big advantages of Lightroom is the fact that the program becomes in the years the tool most used in the industry. Is a bit like Photoshop, even if there’s another faster and cheaper new tool as Affinity Photo, we still stay stick to Photoshop ’cause of workflow compatibility with colleagues and printers.

  2. Disappointed to see that it’s subscription only.

    1. Mhm yes. Seems the model business to use for the software companies in these days. Adobe did the move with the Creative Cloud already some years ago and many others are moving to this business model.

      But let’s consider that if you use the software professionally, but also on as an enthusiast amateur photographer, to pay an update every year is something to consider in the budget… Unluckily we know that photography is an expensive passion! πŸ™‚

    2. Its not subscription only. You can buy a perpetual license for Capture One Pro Universal, which provides full Fujiflm support and tethering for the top 6 cameras, for $299. Exisiting Version 11 license holders can upgrade to 11.3 for free.

      1. I think Chris was referring to the fact that the specific new version addressed only for Fujifilm is not available to buy as a perpetual license.

  3. my question is about the speed of the software. Is C1 any faster at rendering previews at 100%. What about exporting and importing?

    1. Well, for what I see now, C1 Pro takes a bit more time during the import process but it processing already high-quality preview files (on the resolution you set in the preference panel) to work during the development. Then if I want to see a 1:1 preview zooming in the photo, it takes just a little second to process the file, so I would say it’s quite fast.
      On the export process I can say that is fast, but at the moment I haven’t export more than 20 photos together, so I can’t judge so much! πŸ™‚

  4. Thanks for this appraisal, it matched more or less my own experience, I also download C1 for the first time ever today. I tried the Express version for a couple of hours this morning and liked what I saw, also watched a tutorial on YouTube. But wait, the Fujifilm Pro version is subscription only? That’s disappointing since many people looking to leave Adobe are doing so precisely to avoid the subscription trap. I guess I’ll just stick to the free version for now and evaluate whether it’s worth stumping up for the full C1 Pro licence once the Fujifilm film profiles have been added.

    1. As pointed Stephen below, we could eventually purchase the perpetual license of the full Capture One 11 Pro version, witch one include all this specific Fujifilm support + the one for the other hundreds of other cameras…

      Yes, I’m also waiting with much curiosity the film simulation implementation from Capture One! πŸ™‚

  5. There is a bug with the X-T3 files where it renders RAF files as purple. After to-ing and fro-ing with Support they came back with the following info –

    “Hi Steve,

    Yes, this does appear to be a bug specifically within Capture One’s rendering of the X-T3 files. I currently don’t have a fix for it unfortunately.

    Best regards,

    Phase One Technical Support”

    Seems it’s not all it’s cracked up to be!

    1. Oh, thanks to reporting that! Well probably the Fujifilm X-T3 is kind of new camera in town, so they still have to tweak a bit more the .raf conversion! πŸ™‚

  6. Ciao. Articolo molto interessante. PerΓ² io vedo un sacco di rumore stile “vermetti”, specialmente sulle gambe della ragazza. Disturba proprio, la pelle diventa molto brutta. Non Γ¨ che ha problemi con x-trans? Hai provato a fare il confronto con X-tranformer o altri software dallo stesso file RAF?

    1. Ciao Carlo. Allora diciamo che penso come sai, demosaiciizzare l’Xtrans Γ¨ abbastanza difficile. Lightroom al momento presenta maggiormanete il problema che hai evidenziato mentre penso che Capture One al momento faccia un lavoro migliore. Considera che io ho lasciato le imposatazione di dafault per quanto riguarda la riduzione rumore e sharpness in Capture One, quindi potrebbe essere che lavorando sulle impostazioni si possa ad arrivare ad un risultato migliore. In ogni caso, al momento penso che il programma che ritorna il dettaglio migliore sia Iridient Developer / Iridient X-Transformer anche se c’Γ¨ da dire, che con i file che transformo in DNG con Iridient X-Transformer ottengo un rumore superiore a quello che ho di default con Capture One. Insomma sembra essere una coperta corta che tiri da una parte e tira fuori altri problemi dall’altra! πŸ™‚

  7. Pauline Tims

    I am hoping you can help.i have capture one pro11
    I just purchased the Fuji xt3
    I’shoot RAF files
    When I import the Fuji RAF files from XT 3 to Capture One
    Pro 11
    The image turns purple
    Is this a Fuji bug
    Or a capture one bug
    RAF files from XT 2 are fine

    1. Ciao Pauline! I think your problem is related about Capture One 11 and the fact there’s still some issue on the Fujifilm X-T3 since is a relatively new camera on the market! I’m sure that with the next update they will fix the problem! πŸ™‚

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *